Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 6:49:42 GMT
The Superior Court of Justice of Madrid has opened preliminary proceedings against Fernando Simón following the complaint filed by the Christian Lawyers association for the management of the pandemic. The Court will investigate the actions of the director of the Center for Coordination of Emergencies and Health Alerts to investigate whether there was a crime of prevarication in the management of the coronavirus pandemic. The ultra-conservative association also filed a complaint against the President of the Government, Pedro Sanchez, the ministers Irene Montero, Margarita Robles and Fernando Grande-Marlaska and against the former vice presidents of the Executive Carmen Calvo and Pablo Iglesias and the former ministers José Luis Ábalos and Salvador Illa, but the The court has only opened proceedings against Simón because "the procedural situation of the.
People granted jurisdiction at the time the complaint was filed in the Supreme Court had already been resolved by said Court." The complainants accuse the Executive of not taking the necessary measures to confront the pandemic and of hiding information from the public. At the moment, the Court of Instruction No. has transferred the complaint to the Public Ministry Australia Phone Number to issue a report on the jurisdiction of the judicial body and the possible criminal nature of the events reported in the complaint, although it does not exist to date. judicial resolution that provides for its admission or non-admission for processing. ssuming these principles, its first and main purpose is to serve as a guide in the performance of jurisdiction, promoting collective dialogue and personal reflection on the challenges faced by those who exercise it, in a complex and changing legal and social framework.
Courtesy, diligence, transparency: “The judge must at all times provide courteous treatment respectful to all the people involved in the process, showing due consideration to their psychological, social and cultural circumstances. Likewise, they must show a tolerant and respectful attitude towards criticism directed at their decisions . ” It is said that time is such a wise judge that it does not sentence immediately but that, in the end, it agrees with whoever is right. Is not always that way. The discredit to which certain judges subject the administration of justice with their clumsy sentences leave too many unsewn wounds in the plural fabric of many citizens who do not understand why the truth can be condemned and acquitted by judicial clumsiness. the lie. If, as they agreed in their writing, they intended to strengthen citizens' confidence in justice by making explicit the models of behavior according to which.
People granted jurisdiction at the time the complaint was filed in the Supreme Court had already been resolved by said Court." The complainants accuse the Executive of not taking the necessary measures to confront the pandemic and of hiding information from the public. At the moment, the Court of Instruction No. has transferred the complaint to the Public Ministry Australia Phone Number to issue a report on the jurisdiction of the judicial body and the possible criminal nature of the events reported in the complaint, although it does not exist to date. judicial resolution that provides for its admission or non-admission for processing. ssuming these principles, its first and main purpose is to serve as a guide in the performance of jurisdiction, promoting collective dialogue and personal reflection on the challenges faced by those who exercise it, in a complex and changing legal and social framework.
Courtesy, diligence, transparency: “The judge must at all times provide courteous treatment respectful to all the people involved in the process, showing due consideration to their psychological, social and cultural circumstances. Likewise, they must show a tolerant and respectful attitude towards criticism directed at their decisions . ” It is said that time is such a wise judge that it does not sentence immediately but that, in the end, it agrees with whoever is right. Is not always that way. The discredit to which certain judges subject the administration of justice with their clumsy sentences leave too many unsewn wounds in the plural fabric of many citizens who do not understand why the truth can be condemned and acquitted by judicial clumsiness. the lie. If, as they agreed in their writing, they intended to strengthen citizens' confidence in justice by making explicit the models of behavior according to which.